logo
Volume 46, Issue 111 (2-2026)                   Athar 2026, 46(111): 195-219 | Back to browse issues page


XML Persian Abstract Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Mahmoodi Ghouzhdi M R, Talebian M H. (2026). World Heritage in Iran from the Start to the Present: Explaining the Factors Affecting World Heritage Policies and Approaches in Iran. Athar. 46(111), 195-219. doi:10.61882/Athar.1885.3189.5
URL: http://athar.richt.ir/article-2-1885-en.html
1- Assistant Professor, Faculty of Architecture and Urbanism, Imam Khomeini International University, Qazvin, Iran (Corresponding Author).
2- Professor, Department of Restoration, Faculty of Architecture, Fine Arts College, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran. , Mh.talebian@ut.ac.ir
Abstract:   (854 Views)
Abstract
Iran is one of the most influential nations in the World Heritage Convention since its inception. World heritage designation is a much debated process in Iran. In the years following the inception of the world heritage convention diverse policies and approaches were adopted relevant to the convention, with different tangible measures and results emanating therefrom. Understanding these policies and approaches and their outcomes can aid future policymaking in the field of World Heritage. The aim of the present study is to identify World Heritage policies and approaches in a time context and to explain the factors affecting these policies and approaches. For this purpose, this study, by conducting in-depth and semi-structured interviews with key World Heritage stakeholders in Iran and examining supporting and related texts, has used the content analysis method to explain and analyze World Heritage policies and approaches in the period from the formation of the World Heritage Convention to 1400. Through coding, categorization, and classification, the components affecting World Heritage policies and approaches in Iran have been explained. The research findings show that the component of the role of individuals in the World Heritage process in Iran has played a fundamental role in World Heritage policies and approaches in the country, and this effect has continued to this day. In addition, the components of stakeholder participation, the organizational structure of the selection of properties in Iran, and social demand have also had the greatest impact on policymaking in the field of World Heritage in Iran. 
Keywords: World Heritage of Iran, Cultural Heritage, Natural Heritage, Tentative List of World Heritage, Policymaking.

Introduction
The Convention Concerning the Protection of the World Cultural and Natural Heritage is the most significant international instrument for the identification, inscription, protection, and management of the tangible shared heritage of humanity. Over time, it has been widely embraced by states and has come to occupy a central position in the development of heritage conservation practices.
In Iran, long before the establishment of the World Heritage Convention, valuable cultural properties were identified and legally registered as national heritage. Iran actively participated in the formation of the Convention and joined it from its inception. Since then, Iran’s engagement has gone through various phases, leading to significant outcomes in the protection and recognition of cultural heritage.
Throughout this process, different policies regarding World Heritage inscription were adopted in each period, influenced by a range of underlying factors and yielding significant results. Understanding these factors is only possible through an examination of the policies pursued regarding World Heritage from the Convention’s inception to the present day. Gaining insight into the components influencing World Heritage inscription in Iran may help bridge existing gaps at the national and international levels in the years to come and contribute to the refinement of adopted policies.
In this context, the central research question addressed in this study is: “What factors have influenced World Heritage inscription policies in Iran?” Answering this fundamental question requires a comprehensive understanding of the policies pursued in Iran from the outset and the identification of the key elements shaping them
To answer this question, the study gathers and categorizes the experiences of stakeholders involved in the field of World Heritage and analyzes relevant documentation in Iran across four historical periods, spanning from the establishment of the Convention to the year 2021. These data are then examined and interpreted according to the policy approaches adopted in each time period.
The rationale for dividing the timeline into four distinct phases lies in the occurrence of major developments in the field of World Heritage in Iran. The first phase, from the adoption of the World Heritage Convention to the inscription of Iran’s first three properties, represents the country’s initial efforts to join and influence the Convention. The second phase encompasses a 24-year hiatus in inscriptions and explores the factors and circumstances underlying this interruption. The third phase marks the resumption of the inscription process in Iran, while the fourth phase is characterized by the diversification of inscription themes and the emergence of institutional structures aligned with this diversification, extending to the present day.
Finally, through a detailed review of the pursued policies, supported by interviews and documentary evidence, the study identifies and explicates the components that have influenced these policy approaches.

Discussion
World Heritage policies in Iran reveal that these policies are predominantly influenced by specific factors that are not confined to a particular time frame. Several elements affecting the World Heritage process in Iran have manifested differently over time, including governmental pressures, weaknesses in management and conservation structures, the technical and professional capacity of the cultural heritage sector, and the role of universities and academic institutions. However, some factors have functioned as core elements in the World Heritage process in Iran. The following section elaborates on these fundamental factors that have played a central role in shaping policymaking within this process.
The World Heritage Convention has undergone significant changes over time, directly influencing Iran’s world heritage policies. Shifts in the definition of Outstanding Universal Value (OUV), limitations on annual inscriptions, and UNESCO’s evolving registration priorities have reshaped the nomination process in the country. Among these factors, the Tentative List has gained particular importance. Currently (2025), it includes 58 properties (45 cultural, 11 natural, and 2 mixed), reflecting not only Iran’s potential World Heritage sites but also its policy directions. However, the lack of national guidelines, the persistent presence of certain unfeasible properties, and the absence of feasibility assessments have hindered the effectiveness of this list.
The role of key individuals has been highly influential in Iran’s world heritage inscription process. Individual initiatives have played a decisive role in the success of nominations. However, this heavy reliance on individuals rather than institutional structures has led to vulnerabilities in sustaining progress. Moreover, limited technical and academic capacity within organizations and universities has resulted in inconsistent policy-making.
In Iran’s world heritage process, structurally, the National Registration Council, as the main decision-making body, faces several issues, including limited diversity among its members, parallel operations with other councils, the absence of a defined role for civil society organizations, and a lack of clear operational guidelines. Decision-making is centralized within the Ministry of Cultural Heritage, with provincial offices playing a minimal role. Additionally, the lack of long-term planning, weak public communication, and an unclear framework for community participation have further complicated the process.
While stakeholder participation is considered a core principle internationally, in Iran it remains underdeveloped. Interviews reveal that authorities often view public involvement skeptically, questioning the expertise of local stakeholders. This has led to limited transparency and reduced public trust. Nevertheless, the growth of social capital surrounding the concept of World Heritage has generated local and national support for nomination efforts. Still, when promises of inscription are not fulfilled, it may lead to public dissatisfaction and disillusionment.

Conclusion
The process of World Heritage inscription in Iran has followed a complex and turbulent path, yielding tangible outcomes. The evolution of the cultural heritage movement in the country has significantly contributed to the development of the very concept of cultural heritage and has, in itself, functioned as a mechanism for its protection. The policies and approaches concerning World Heritage in Iran have, over time, been influenced by a range of factors—some with effects limited to specific periods, and others exerting influence to the present day.
Among these, the role of individuals has emerged as the most influential factor shaping World Heritage policies and approaches in the country. A historical review, supported by documentary evidence, reveals that policymaking in this domain has largely been driven by the perspectives and decisions of individuals involved in the process. The positive impact of individual agency is evident in the successful inscription of certain sites; however, in some periods, the same individual involvement has contributed to the failure of nomination dossiers. Furthermore, the prominent role of individuals has hindered the institutionalization and stabilization of a comprehensive organizational structure for World Heritage affairs. Despite the establishment of advisory councils within the Ministry of Cultural Heritage for the nomination and selection of sites, the influence of individuals remains a decisive factor in the success of nominations.
On another front, although community participation is a fundamental aspect of the World Heritage process, stakeholders in Iran have rarely played a significant or influential role. This lack of engagement has led to a policy approach that is predominantly institutionally internalized. Nevertheless, the notion of stakeholder participation in Iran has often been equated with a form of social demand for World Heritage inscription, which may be understood as a type of social capital. This social capital—embodied in the desire of local communities to see their heritage sites inscribed—has in turn linked heritage protection efforts with the pursuit of World Heritage status as a justification for national-level policy initiatives.
Additionally, the changing procedural and regulatory conditions of the World Heritage Convention itself—particularly shifts in the criteria and nomination requirements over time—have directly influenced national policymaking. In many cases, the sites selected for nomination have been aligned with UNESCO’s evolving strategies. In this context, Iran’s Tentative List has acted as a reflection of national policy direction, effectively shaping the future trajectory of the country’s World Heritage agenda.
 
Full-Text [PDF 2106 kb]   (227 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Original Research Article | Subject: Iran Heritage
Received: 2025/02/13 | Accepted: 2025/07/3 | Published: 2026/02/20

References
1. - بهشتی، سید محمد، (1401). گفتگوی شخصی با نویسندگان. تهران: فروردین 1401، در دفتر کار شخصی مهندس بهشتی.
2. - پورعلی، مصطفی، (1401). گفتگوی شخصی با نویسندگان. تهران: خرداد 1401، دفتر اداره کل ثبت وزارت میراث‌فرهنگی.
3. - حجت، مهدی، (1380). میراث‌فرهنگی در ایران: سیاست‌ها برای یک کشور اسلامی. تهران: سازمان میراث‌فرهنگی (پژوهشگاه).
4. - حدادی، سیما، (1401). گفتگوی شخصی با نویسندگان. تهران: اردیبهشت 1401، دفتر اداره کل ثبت وزارت میراث‌فرهنگی.
5. - حناچی، پیروز، (1401). گفتگوی شخصی با نویسندگان. تهران: اردیبهشت 1401، دفتر شخصی در باغ نگارستان.
6. - خادم‌زاده، محمدحسن، (1401). گفتگوی شخصی با نویسندگان. تهران: خرداد 1401، دفتر شخصی در دانشگاه تهران.
7. - دبیری، فرهاد؛ لقائی، حسنعلی؛ و شیرازیان، شیرین، (1393). «بررسی کنوانسیون حمایت از میراث‌های فرهنگی و طبیعی (1972) و انتخاب چند نمونه از آثار طبیعی ملی ایران و تطبیق با معیارهای کنوانسیون مذکور جهت ثبت در فهرست میراث‌های جهانی». علوم و تکنولوژی محیط زیست، 16(ویژه نامه): 281-298. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/86985/fa
8. - رایتی‌مقدم، حسین، (1401). گفتگوی شخصی با نویسندگان. تهران: خرداد 1401، مصاحبه اینترنتی.
9. - ریاحی‌مقدم، ساشا، (1400). نظام‌نامۀ پایگاه‌های میراث‌فرهنگی کشور (شیوه‌نامه اداری پایگاه‌های میراث جهانی و ملی). تهران: وزارت میراث‌فرهنگی، گردشگری و صنایع‌دستی.
10. - طالبیان، محمدحسن، (1400). گفتگوی شخصی با نویسندگان. تهران: اسفند 1400، در دفتر کار شخصی دکتر طالبیان در عمارت کوشک.
11. - طالبیان، محمدحسن؛ و فلاحت، م.، (1385). منظرهای فرهنگی: مجموعه مباحث کارگاه کارشناسی ارتقاء مدیریت و برنامه‌ریزی منظرهای فرهنگی میراث جهانی. بنیاد پژوهشی پارسه پاسارگاد (سازمان میراث‌فرهنگی کشور).
12. - عدل، شهریار، (1386). «داستان ثبت تخت جمشید، نقش‌جهان و چغازنبیل در یونسکو». نشریه بخارا، ش 62.
13. - عدل، شهریار، (1394). «پیشینه و چگونگی ثبت آثار جهانی ایران». نشریه بخارا، ش 107.
14. - فیروز، اسکندر، (1392). خاطرات فیروز اسکندر- دو دهه تلاش برای حفظ طبیعت و محیط‌زیست ایران. تهران: تدبیر روشن.
15. - قاسمی، حمید؛ و همکاران (1400). مرجع پژوهش. تهران: اندیشه آرا.
16. - قمی اویلی، علی (1401). گفتگوی شخصی با نویسندگان. تهران: اردیبهشت 1401، دفتر اداره کل ثبت وزارت میراث‌فرهنگی.
17. - کارگاه بین‌المللی نجات بخشی میراث‌فرهنگی بم، بیانیه‌ها و توصیه‌های نهایی (1383). مجله اثر، ۳۶ و ۳۷.
18. - گلشن، جلیل، (1401). گفتگوی شخصی با نویسندگان. تهران: اردیبهشت 1401، دفتر شخصی در موزه ملی ایران
19. - محمودی قوژدی، محمدرضا؛ طالبیان، محمدحسن؛ و وطن‌دوست، رسول، (1401 الف).«تبیین شکاف‌ها و عدم تعادل‌های فهرست میراث جهانی ایران». نامه معماری و شهرسازی، 15(37): 121-145. https://doi.org/10.30480/aup.2022.3988.1874
20. - محمودی‌قوژدی، محمدرضا؛ طالبیان، محمدحسن؛ و وطن‌دوست، رسول، (1401 ب). «تبیین مؤلفه‌های شکل‌دهندۀ کنوانسیون حمایت از میراث‌فرهنگی و طبیعی جهان (۱۹۷۲) در بستر زمان». مطالعات معماری ایران، 11(22): 215-236. https://doi.org/10.22052/jias.2022.245958.0
21. - محمودی‌قوژدی، محمدرضا؛ و طالبیان، محمدحسن، (1402). «تبیین رویکرد نهادهای مشاور کمیتۀ میراث جهانی در ارزیابی پرونده‌های نامزد میراث جهانی ایران». مطالعات معماری ایران، 12(23): 116-95.
22. - محمودی‌قوژدی، محمدرضا؛ و شفیعا، سعید، (1402). بررسی فرآیند ثبت میراث جهانی در ایران و ارائه راهکارهای تقنینی. مرکز پژوهش‌های مجلس شورای اسلامی.
23. - مرادی، حسن؛ و عرب‌نصرآبادی، فهیمه، (1398). «بررسی روند ثبت آثار در فهرست آثار ملی غیرمنقول». در: احمد محیط طباطبایی (و.)، فر فیروز: جشن‌نامه دکتر فیروز باقرزاده، تهران: پژوهشگاه میراث‌فرهنگی و گردشگری.
24. - مؤمنی‎راد، اکبر؛ علی‌آبادی، خدیجه؛ فردانش، هاشم؛ و مزینی، ناصر، (1392). «تحلیل محتوای کیفی در آیین پژوهش: ماهیت، مراحل و اعتبار نتایج». فصلنامه اندازه‌گیری تربیتی، 4(14): 222-187.
25. - وطن‌دوست، رسول، (1401). گفت‌وگوی شخصی با نویسنده. تهران: اردیبهشت 1401، مصاحبه اینترنتی.
27. References
28. - Adl, Sh., (2007). “The story of the inscription of Persepolis, Naqsh-e Jahan, and Chogha Zanbil in UNESCO”. Bukhara Journal, (62). (In Persian).
29. - Adl, Sh., (2015). “Background and process of the inscription of Iran’s World Heritage sites”. Bukhara Journal, (107). (In Persian).
30. - Batisse, M. & Bolla, G., (2005). The Invention of “World Heritage” (Issue 2). Unesco-Association of Former Unesco Staff Members.
31. - Beheshti, S. M., (2022, March). Personal communication [Interview]. Tehran: Private office. (In Persian).
32. - Chelimsky, E., (1989). Content analysis: A methodology for structuring and analyzing written material. Publish by: united states General Accounting Office (GAO).
33. - Dabiri, F., Loghayi, H. A. & Shirazian, Sh., (2014). “Examining the Convention concerning the Protection of the World Cultural and Natural Heritage (1972) and selecting several national natural sites of Iran in comparison with the convention’s criteria for World Heritage listing”. Environmental Science and Technology, 16(Special Issue), 281–298. https://sid.ir/paper/86985/fa. (In Persian).
34. - Department for Culture Media and Sport (United Kingdom). (2011). Review of the Tentative List of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203300336
35. - Firouz, E., (2013). Memoirs of Eskandar Firouz: Two decades of effort for nature and environmental protection in Iran. Tehran: Tadbir Roshan. (In Persian).
36. - Ghasemi, H. et al. (2021). Research reference. Tehran: Andisheh Ara. (In Persian).
37. - Ghomi Avili, A., (2022, May). Personal communication [Interview]. Tehran: Office of National Heritage Registration. (In Persian).
38. - Golshan, J., (2022, May). Personal communication [Interview]. Tehran: Private office in National Museum of Iran. (In Persian).
39. - Hadadi, S., (2022, May). Personal communication [Interview]. Tehran: Office of National Heritage Registration. (In Persian).
40. - Hanachi, P., (2022, May). Personal communication [Interview]. Tehran: Private office in Negarestan Garden. (In Persian).
41. - Henley, J., (2001). Fighting For The Mighty Monuments. The Gaurdian, 6 Aug 2001.
42. - Hojjat, M., (2001). Cultural heritage in Iran: Policies for an Islamic country. Tehran: Iranian Cultural Heritage Organization.
43. - International Workshop on the Safeguarding of the Cultural Heritage of Bam. (2004). “Final statements and recommendations”. Athar Journal, (36–37). (In Persian).
44. - Khademzadeh, M. H., (2022, June). Personal communication [Interview]. Tehran University, Private office. (In Persian).
45. - Mahmoudi Qouzhdi, M. R., Talebian, M. H. & Vatandoust, R., (2022). “Identifying the formative components of the 1972 World Heritage Convention over time”. Journal of Iranian Architecture Studies, 11(22): 215–236. https://doi.org/10.22052/jias.2022.245958.0. (In Persian).
46. - Mahmoudi Qouzhdi, M. R., Talebian, M. H. & Vatandoust, R., (2022). “Identifying the gaps and imbalances in Iran’s World Heritage list”. Nameh-ye Memari va Shahrsazi, 15(37): 121–145. https://doi.org/10.30480/aup.2022.3988.1874. (In Persian).
47. - Mahmoudi Qouzhdi, M. R. & Talebian, M. H., (2023). “Assessment of the advisory bodies' approach to Iran's World Heritage nomination dossiers”. Journal of Iranian Architecture Studies, 12(23): 95–116. (In Persian).
48. - Mahmoudi Qouzhdi, M. R. & Shafi’a, S., (2023). Examining the World Heritage inscription process in Iran and proposing legislative solutions. Tehran: Islamic Parliament Research Center. (In Persian).
49. - Moradi, H. & Arab Nasrabadi, F., (2019). “An analysis of the process of inscription of immovable properties in the national heritage list”. In: A. M. Tabatabaei (Ed.), Festschrift for Dr. Firouz Bagherzadeh. Tehran: Research Institute of Cultural Heritage and Tourism. (In Persian).
50. - Momeni Rad, A., Ali Abadi, Kh., Fardansh, H. & Mazini, N., (2013). “Qualitative content analysis in research: Nature, steps, and validity of results”. Journal of Educational Measurement, 4(14): 187–222. (In Persian).
51. - Parks Canada. (2017). Updating Canada’s Tentative List for World Heritage Sites. Information Document. http://www.worldcat.org/title/world-heritage-canadas-tentative-list-for-world-heritage-sites/oclc/439953340&referer=brief_results
52. - Pourali, M., (2022, June). Personal communication [Interview]. Tehran: Office of National Heritage Registration, Ministry of Cultural Heritage. (In Persian).
53. - Rayati Moghaddam, H., (2022, June). Personal communication [Online interview]. (In Persian).
54. - Riyahi Moghaddam, S., (2021). National directive for heritage sites in Iran (administrative protocol for World and National Heritage Sites). Tehran: Ministry of Cultural Heritage, Tourism and Handicrafts. (In Persian).
55. - Talebian, M. H., (2022, February). Personal communication [Interview]. Tehran: Private office in Koushk building. (In Persian).
56. - Talebian, M. H. & Falahat, M., (2006). Cultural landscapes: Proceedings of the workshop on improving management and planning of World Heritage cultural landscapes. Tehran: Parseh-Pasargadae Research Foundation. (In Persian).
57. - UNESCO, (1977). World heritage centre. 1st Session of World Heritage Committee Report. Paris: UNESCO
58. - UNESCO, (1997). World Heritage Committee-Twenty-first session. Item 8 of the Provisional Agenda: Information on Tentative Lists
59. - UNESCO World Heritage Centre, (2024). Operational Guidelines for the Implementation of the World Heritage Convention (Issue July). http://whc.unesco.org/archive/opguide08-en.pdf
60. - URL 1: https://rc.majlis.ir/fa/law/show/97176
61. - URL 2: rc.majlis.ir /fa/law/show/91172
62. - URL 3: rc.majlis.ir/fa/law/show/94002
63. - URL 4: https://whc.unesco.org/en/tentativelists/?action=listtentative&state=ir&order=states. Retrive 24 March 2025
64. - URL 5: rc.majlis.ir/fa/law/show/123185
65. - URL 6: https://whc.unesco.org/en/statesparties/ir/
66. - Vatandoust, R., (2022, May). Personal communication [Online interview] (In Persian).

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
CAPTCHA

Send email to the article author


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.